Reply To: Module 5 case 2 prompt 7

[Leah Stetzel]

Is there a reason you didn’t comment on all 4 metrics? 1 to NA, SN, 2 to NB, MP?

Also, I thought lower incisor to NB would advance both due to growth and treatment? Not treatment alone. Ie, wiithout treatment, with CS4, I would’ve expected lower incisor to NB to increase.

Can you read my responses and give me some feedback on what the graders might think of these answers?

1. Max incisor maintained AP position relative to NA due to treatment (growth restrained by FA, side effect of Class II mechanics)

2. Max incisor retracted AP position relative to SN due to treatment (growth restrained by FA, and retraction due to bracket prescription, side effect of Class II mechanics)

3. Lower incisor advanced relative to NB due to growth + treatment

4. Lower incisor proclined relative to MP due to treatment effect

Thanks for your time.