-
Case 1 prompt 5 (module 2)
The answer includes “advance maxillary incisors” . Could you please explain why?
In a Class II like this case wouldn`t we want to maintain maxillary incisors in AP and just correct their inclination/torque. Advancing them would increase the overjet and go against our attempt in correcting the Class II in a growing patient. I understand U1-NAmm is decreased but again here ceph measurements X clinical findings/goals.
Thank you!
-
2 Replies
-
I agree with you here.
-
I think the person that prepared this case was intending Advance Incisors as improving the “U1-NA”
I agree the proclination is the fundamental.
-
The forum ‘Synapse Orthodontics: Module 2’ is closed to new discussions and replies.